UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  x                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

PRIMEENERGY CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement,proxy statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

PrimeEnergy Corporation

TO BE HELD

May 2, 201310, 2016

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of PrimeEnergy Corporation (the “Company”) will be held on Thursday,Tuesday, May 2, 2013,10, 2016, at 9:00 a.m., EDT, at the offices of the Company, One Landmark Square, 11th Floor, Stamford, Connecticut 06901, for the following purposes:

1. To elect a Board of Directors of seven (7) persons as nominated in the accompanying Proxy Statement,proxy statement, such Directors to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected;

2. An advisory (non-binding) vote to approve our executive compensation as described in the accompanying Proxy Statement;proxy statement; and

3. An advisory (non-binding) vote on the frequency of future votes on executive compensation, and

4. To transact such other procedural business as may properly be brought before the Meeting or at any adjournment or adjournments thereof.

The Meeting may be adjourned from time to time without other notice than by announcement at the Meeting, or at any adjournment thereof, and any and all business for which the Meeting is hereby noticed may be transacted at any such adjournment.

The Board of Directors has fixed March 26, 2013,April 5, 2016, as the date for the taking of a record of the stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Meeting and at any adjournment or adjournments thereof. The stock transfer books will not be closed.

Enclosed is a form of proxy solicited by the Board of Directors of the Company. Stockholders who do not plan to attend the Meeting in person are requested to date, sign and return the enclosed proxy in the enclosed envelope, to which no postage need be affixed if mailed in the United States. Your proxy may be revoked at any time before it is exercised and will not be used if you attend the Meeting and prefer to vote in person.

April 5, 201322, 2016

Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of

Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders

to be held on May 2, 201310, 2016

The proxy material for this Annual Meeting and the Company’s 20122015 Annual Report

to Stockholders are available at www.RRDEZProxy.com/2013/PrimeEnergyCorporationwww.proxydocs.com/PNRG

PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PrimeEnergy Corporation

9821 Katy Freeway

Houston, Texas 77024

PROXY STATEMENT

Solicitation by the Board of Directors of Proxies from

Stockholders for Annual Meeting of Stockholders

May  2, 201310, 2016

GENERAL INFORMATION

The Board of Directors of PrimeEnergy Corporation, a Delaware corporation, (hereinafter called the “Company”) solicits your proxy in the enclosed form which, if you do not plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company on Thursday,Tuesday, May 2, 2013,10, 2016, you are requested to fill out, sign as indicated and return to the Company in the enclosed self-addressed envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States. Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by the person giving it at any time before it is exercised by notice (i) in person by the stockholder’s oral revocation at the Annual Meeting or (2) in writing to the Company at One Landmark Square, Stamford, Connecticut 06901 (Attention: Corporate Secretary), if the proxy was executed and returned. The approximate date on which the proxy statement and form of proxy will be sent to security holders is April 5, 2013.22, 2016.

Proxies are being solicited by mail and all expenses of solicitation have been or will be borne by the Company. In addition, arrangements may be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to send proxies and proxy materialmaterials to their principals and the Company will reimburse them for their expenses in so doing.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 26, 2013April 5, 2016 (the “Record Date”), are entitled to vote at the 20132016 Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof. There were 2,501,1382,294,553 shares of common stock (“Common Stock”) outstanding on the Record Date. Each holder of Common Stock is entitled to vote on the proposals presented in this Proxy Statementproxy statement for each share held, each share entitling the record holder thereof to one vote.

Matters to be Voted on at the Annual Meeting

There are three (3)two (2) proposals that are scheduled to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. ShareholdersStockholders are being asked to vote on (1) the election of seven (7) Directors named herein to the Board of Directors of the Company,Company; and (2) an advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the executive compensation paid as described in this Proxy Statement, and (3) an advisory (non-binding) vote on the frequency of future votes on executive compensation. .proxy statement.

Vote Required

All shares of the Company represented by proxies received in time and in proper form and condition and not revoked will be voted as specified in the proxy; or in the absence of specific direction, the proxy will be voted by the person designated therein:

FOR the election as Directors of the Company of the seven (7) nominees named herein, to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors shall be duly elected; and

FOR the approval of executive compensation, and

FOR a three year frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation.

In the event any of the nominees should become unable to serve as a Director, it is intended that, pursuant to the accompanying form of proxy, votes will be cast for a substitute nominee designated by the Board of Directors.

The election of Directors will require the affirmative votes of a plurality of the shares of the Common Stock voting in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. The Company’s transfer agent will tabulate all votes that are received prior to the date of the Annual Meeting. The Company will appoint two inspectors of election, who may be officers or employees, to receive the transfer agent’s tabulation, to tabulate all other votes, and to certify the results of the elections. Abstentions and broker non-votes are each included in the determination of the number of shares present and voting (i.e., for quorum purposes), but shall not be counted for the purposes of the election of Directors.

As to the advisory vote for the approval of the compensation paid to the named executive officers described in this proxy statement, the approval will be determined by a majority of the votes cast, without regard to broker non-votes or proxies marked “Abstain.” With respect to the advisory vote on the frequency of future votes on executive compensation, a shareholder may vote for 1, 2 or 3 years, or may abstain, and the advisory vote on frequency will be determined by the number of years that receives the most votes cast.

The management knows of no matters to be submitted to the 20132016 Annual Meeting with respect to which the stockholders are entitled to vote other than the election of Directors and the two (2) advisory (non-binding) votesvote described above, but if procedural matters do properly come before the Meeting, the persons named in the proxy will vote according to their best judgment.

SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN

BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth the number and percentage of shares of the Common Stock of the Company owned beneficially by any person, including any “group” as that term is defined in Section 12d (3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of five percent (5%) or more of the Common Stock, as of March 26, 2013.April 12, 2016. Information as to beneficial ownership is based upon statements furnished to the Company by such persons. Except as indicated, all shares are held directly, with full voting and dispositive powers, and percentages are calculated on the basis of the shares issued and outstanding, and with respect to those named persons holding options presently exercisable or within 60 days of March 26, 2013,April 12, 2016, includes the number of shares to be issued upon exercise of such options.

(2)

Includes 391,422 shares as to which Mr. Drimal has noRobert de Rothschild, Michael A. Varet and Rene-Pierre Azria have shared voting orand investment power. Robert de Rothchild disclaims beneficial ownership except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in the shares. Neither Mr. Varet nor Mr. Azria has any pecuniary interest in the shares.

(2)(3)

Includes 101,500 shares held of record by The Gaines Wehrle Revocable Trust Indenture dated November 4, 2011 as to which Mr. Wehrle has sole voting and investment power and 140,000 shares held of record by The Gaines Wehrle 2008 Family Trust as to which Mr. Wehrle has sole voting and investment power.

(3)(4)

Includes 300 shares as to which Mr. EckensteinHurt has sole voting and investment power with respect to theseand 201,250 shares pursuant to voting agreement dated March 2013 with Board of Directors of the Eckenstein-Geigy-Stiftung Foundation, the record owner of such shares. Mr. Eckenstein has no dispositive power with respect to such shares and no pecuniary interest in such shares.

(4)	Shares held of record by Clint Hurt & Associates, Inc., a private company controlled by Mr. Hurt as to which Mr. Hurt has sole voting and investment power.

(5)

Includes 177,000162,500 shares as to which Mr. Smeets has sole voting and investment power, and 7,500 shares as to which Mr. Smeets has sole voting power pursuant to voting agreements dated June 29, 2006, as to 2,500 each, between Mr. Smeets and his three sons who are the record owners of such shares. Mr. Smeets has no dispositive power with respect to such 7,500 shares and no pecuniary interest in such shares.

(6)

Includes 54,141 shares as to which Mr. Fong has shared voting and investment power and 82,800 shares for which Mr. Fong has sole voting power pursuant to voting agreements dated June 28, 2006, between Mr. Fong and his two sons who are the record owners of such shares. Mr. Fong has no dispositive powers with respect to such 82,800 shares and no pecuniary interest in such shares.

The following table sets forth information at March 26, 2013,April 12, 2016, with respect to the shares of the Company’s Common Stock beneficially owned by the Directors, and the executive officers of the Company, individually, and as a group:

(7)(6)

Includes 177,000162,500 shares as to which Mr. Smeets has sole voting and investment power, and 7,500 shares as to which Mr. Smeets has sole voting power pursuant to voting agreements dated June 29, 2006, as to 2,500 each, between Mr. Smeets and his three sons who are the record owners of such shares. Mr. Smeets has no dispositive power with respect to such 7,500 shares and no pecuniary interest in such shares.

(7)

Includes 101,500 shares held of record by The Gaines Wehrle Revocable Trust Indenture dated November 4, 2011 as to which Mr. Wehrle has sole voting and investment power and 140,000 shares held of record by The Gaines Wehrle 2008 Family Trust as to which Mr. Wehrle has sole voting and investment power.

Mr. Drimal is the only Director who has pledged Common Stock as security.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(PROPOSAL NO. 1)

Directors and Nominees

There will be submitted by the management to the 20132016 Annual Meeting for election as Directors, the seven (7) nominees whose names, together with certain information concerning them, are set out below. All of the nominees are presently serving as Directors of the Company. Each nominee wasCompany, were elected to their present term of office by the shareholdersstockholders and hashave served continuously as a Director since the datedates indicated below. The term of those nominees whose termswho are currently serving as Directors are expiring this year,year. All of the nominees are proposed for re-electionelection for a one yearone-year term expiring in 2014.2017. Four of the Company’snominees for Directors arequalify as independent directors within the meaning of applicable regulatory standards. There is no family relationship between any nominee for Director or the executive officers of the Company. In the event any of the nominees shall become unable to serve as a Director, it is intended that the proxy will be voted for a substitute nominee designated by the Board of Directors; however, no circumstances are at present known which would render any nominee unavailable.

The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR the election of all Nominees

(Proposal No. 1 on the Proxy)

Nominees

Beverly A. Cummings, age 60,63, is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a Bachelor of Science degree from the State University of New York and a Master of Business Administration from Rutgers University. She was elected Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company in October, 1987, and Executive Vice President and Treasurer in May, 1991, and serves as the Principal Financial Officer of the Company. Ms. Cummings holds similar positions with the Company’s subsidiaries. The attributes that prompted Ms. Cummings’ election to the Board were her significant financial skills and experience, as well as her understanding of oil and gas operations, and in particular of those of PrimeEnergy. Those qualifications continue to contribute to her effective service as a director today.

Charles E. Drimal, Jr., age 65,68, has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since October 1987, and holds the position of Chairman of the Board of Directors. He also holds similar positions with the Company’s subsidiaries. Mr. Drimal is a graduate of the University of Maryland and Samford University School of Law and is a retired member of the New York State Bar. The leadership skills, experience and thorough knowledge of the oil and gas industry that uniquely qualified Mr. Drimal to become the President and Chief Executive Officer in 1987 have continued to make him an invaluable member and Chairman of the Board of Directors.

Mr. Eckenstein, age 83, is a Swiss citizen and a resident of Switzerland. He studied law and architecture in Basel, Switzerland, at the University of Geneva and the Ecole des Beaux Arts, Paris, France. He is a director and principal in several privately held companies providing financial consulting services in construction, hotel management and architectural matters. Mr. Eckenstein brings to the Board a global and varied perspective which stem from his background in managing all phases of numerous successful construction operations in Europe and the United States. Mr. Eckenstein’s valuable first-hand experience in the development, financing and construction of large commercial projects factored into his election to the Board and has proven beneficial to the Board over the last 24 years.

Mr. Fong, age 68,71, is Presidentpresident of Gifford Fong Associates, an investment technology consulting firm located in Lafayette, California. Mr. Fong holds a Bachelor of Science, a Master of Business Administration and a Juris

Doctor degree from the University of California. Mr. Fong is the editor of The Journal of Investment Management and is the author and a frequent contributor of numerous trade journal publications. Mr. Fong’s expertise in transaction valuation, portfolio risk management and asset management is an important resource for the Board. His substantial knowledge and experience in financial matters and business operations fully qualify him to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Thomas S. T. Gimbel, age 58,61, is the Executive Managing Director of Optima Fund Management LLC, an investment advisory and asset management firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, with offices in New York City. He previously served as Managing Director, Business and Product Development of that firm. Prior to joining Optima, he was the Managing Director of Hedge Fund Investments at Credit Suisse Asset Management, New York. In addition, he is Vice Presidentthe Chief Executive Officer and Director of American Farmland Company, a Maryland Corporation. Mr. Gimbel holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics from Bowdoin College and a Master of Business Administration from Columbia University Graduate School of Business. His proven ability to develop successful investment and management strategies for his clients, his keen business acumen, and his knowledge of the financial markets were some of the qualities that first formed the basis for his election to the Board. Those qualities, along with his experience in financial analysis, continue to make Mr. Gimbel’s participation on the Board efficacious.

Clint Hurt, age 7780 is president of Clint Hurt & Associates, Inc., a private oil and gas exploration company located in Midland, Texas. He is past president of the Independent Oil & Gas Association of West Virginia and is a former director of Chase Bank of Texas, in Midland, Texas. Mr. Hurt’s expertise in the oil and gas industry and his unique insight into the trends and developments in the industry made him an excellent candidate for the Board. Those attributes have also enabled him to make an important contribution to the Company in his 2528 years of service to the Board.

Jan K. Smeets, age 65, is a citizen of the Netherlands and a resident of the United States. Mr. Smeets is a graduate of M.I.T. and holds a Master of Business Administration from Stanford Business School. Mr. Smeets68, is the President of Smeets Management, Inc., a privately held companyconsulting firm in Larchmont, New York that provides administrative and management consulting services. Prior to thatYork. Mr. Smeets washolds a Bachelor of Science and a Master of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Masters of Business Administration from Stamford Graduate School of Business. In the course of his career, Mr. Smeets worked as a process engineer at Lago Oil & Transport Company (ESSO)for Exxon in Aruba and as a management consultant with McKinsey &and Company serving clients in New Yorkthe communications, chemicals and a directoroil industries. He also served on the board of the Citco Group, Ltd.an international financial services provider. His background in assessing and analyzing financial statements and related reportsreporting qualify him as an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and enable him to fulfill his role as Chairman of the Audit Committee. Mr. Smeets’ experience in advising businesses on the development of operational budgets, capital plans, and strategic goals have also resulted in his effectively serving the Board as a director.

Ebersole Gaines Wehrle, age 58, served as a director of the Company from 1987 through 2007. He resigned following the formation of McJunkin Red Man Corporation for whom he served as director, and which corporation was the result of a merger of his family’s business, the McJunkin Corporation and Red Man Pipe and Supply Co. Mr. Wehrle’s experience in the oil and gas industry spans thirty years. He worked for and was a

majority owner and director of the McJunkin Corporation, which was a wholesale provider of piping and supplies for oil and gas operations. Mr. Wehrle has also owned and operated oil and gas wells in the United States through his own private ventures. He attended Princeton University and received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Anthropology. He no longer serves as a director of any corporation and is currently self-employed and engaged in the management of his family’s investments. The depth of Mr. Wehrle’s extensive experience in the oil and gas industry, his history with the Company and his understanding of a director’s responsibilities, provide him with unique knowledge and skills that make him a valuable member of the Company’s Board of Directors.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of all Nominees

(Proposal No. 1)

Information about the Executive Officers (for information regarding Ms. Cummings and Mr. Drimal, see the descriptiondescriptions on page 4)5).

Patricia C. Delaney, age 54, has served as the Secretary of the Company since May 2012, and serves as secretary of the Company’s subsidiaries. She is an attorney in Hauppauge, New York.

Lynne Pizor, age 53, served as Controller of the Company from January 1986 until June 2011, when she resigned.

Mr. Drimal Ms. Cummings and Ms. DelaneyCummings were elected by the Board of Directors to their respective offices in May 2012,2015, at the annual meeting of the Board. Each will hold their respective offices until his or her successor is elected by the Board.

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

On April 17, 2012,January 4, 2016, the Company purchased 45,17910,000 shares of Common Stock from Thomas S.T. Gimbel,Jan K. Smeets, for the price of $25$48.00 per share. Mr. GimbelSmeets is a Director and a Director Nominee of the Company. The transaction was approved by the members of the Audit Committee.Board of Directors.

Clint Hurt, a directorDirector and Director Nominee of the Company, is a member of Hurt Interest LLC, a company owned by Mr. Hurt and a family member. In the normal course of their businesses, Mr. Hurt and Hurt Interest LLC make investments in oil and gas producing properties, some of which are operated by the Company’s subsidiary, Prime Operating Company. They receive, like the other interest owners in the properties operated by Prime Operating Company, including the Company, revenue payments from the sale of oil and gas produced by the properties. They are also required, like the other interest owners in those properties, to pay their proportionate share of the expenses to develop and operate those properties. In 2012,2014, Mr. Hurt and Hurt Interest LLC received approximately $699,000$219,608, from the Company for their interests in properties operated by the Company, of which Mr. Hurt received $419,500.$114,704.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Independence and Composition

The core responsibility of the Board of Directors is to provide objective, independent judgment in its management oversight function and the Board’s composition reflects that principle. The Board is composed of a majority of independent directors. A director’s independence is determined in accordance with the definition set forth in National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (“NASDAQ”) listing standards and other pertinent and applicable legal and regulatory standards. The Board of Directors annually reviews the relationships between directors orand members of their immediate families and the Company, in order to make recommendations to the full Board for its determination regarding the independence of each director. As a result of this review, the Board has determined that the following directors are independent directors: Matthias Eckenstein, H. Gifford Fong, Thomas S.T. Gimbel, and Jan K. Smeets.Smeets and Ebersole Gaines Wehrle are independent directors.

Board Leadership

The Board of Directors, in its discretion, may elect a Chairman of the Board. The Chairman leads the Board and presides at all Board meetings, and is responsible for delivery of information for the Board’s informed decision-making.

Based upon the structure that best serves the interests of the Company, the Board determines whether the role of the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer should be held by one individual or should be separated. Currently, the Board believes that the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer should be held by the same person because this combination has served the Company well in the past and continues to work well today, by providing unified leadership and direction. The Directors have also determined that it is not necessary to appoint a lead independent director at this time.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Company’s risk management efforts are the responsibility of the Board of Directors. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and the Chief Financial Officer and other officers of the Company review with the Board areas of material operational, financial and regulatory risks and the likelihood of the risks coming to fruition, to enablefruition. This enables the Board to understandhave a thorough understanding of the relative magnitude of such risks and to assess and influence the management and mitigation strategies undertaken by the Company.Company to address those risks.

Board Meetings

The Board of Directors met three timestwice in 2012.2015. Each director attended 75% or more of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board of Directors and the committee or committees thereof on which such director served during 2012.

Board Attendance at Annual Meeting

The Company does not have a policy that requires members of the Board of Directors to attend the Annual Meeting. All members of the Board of Directors are encouraged to attend the Annual Meeting. All of the members of the Board of Directors attended the Annual Meeting of the Company held in May 2012 except Matthias Eckenstein and Thomas S. T. Gimbel.2015 in person or by telephone conference.

Committees of the Board

The Board of Directors has an Executive Committee, an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee, composed of Messrs. Drimal, Jr., Hurt, Smeets and Ms. Cummings, is authorized to exercise all the authority of the Board in the business and affairs of the Company, except as limited by applicable law. The Executive Committee met three timestwice during 2012,2015, and informally, by telephone conference on a regular basis, usually weekly, during the year.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee, composed of Messrs. Eckenstein, HurtWehrle, Gimbel and Smeets, met once in 2012.2015. All members of the Audit Committee were independent under NASDAQ listing standards and other pertinent legal and regulatory standards. Mr. Wehrle, as the beneficial owner of more than 10% of the outstanding stock of the Company, falls outside of the safe harbor provisions of SEC Rule 10A-3(e)(1)(ii). The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Smeets meets the qualifications of an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and NASDAQ listing standards. The Committee

selects and engages independent auditors to audit the books, records and accounts of the Company, determines the scope of such audits, and reviews the financial policies and control procedures of the Company. The report of the Audit Committee is included in this Proxy Statementproxy statement on page 11.13. The Board of Directors and the Audit Committee have adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, a copy of which was attached as AnnexExhibit A to the Company’s 2011 Proxy Statement. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Hurt no longer meets the criteria for director independence under NASDAQ listing standards. The Board will select another member of the Committee during 2013.2014 proxy statement.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee, composed of Messrs. Hurt, Gimbel and Smeets, met twiceonce in 2012.2015. All members of the Compensation Committee were independent under NASDAQ listing standards and other pertinent legal and regulatory standards. The charter of the Compensation Committee also requires that members of the Committee also qualify as “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and as “non-employee” directors within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Committee annually reviews and evaluates the Company’s compensation policies and establishes salaries, bonuses and other compensation for the Company’s executive officers and directors. Mr. Drimal and Ms. Cummings participate in discussions with the Compensation Committee and make recommendations to the Committee with respect to the compensation of executive officers and directors. Neither Mr. Drimal nor Ms. Cummings participates in the deliberations or approval of the Committee concerning their respective compensation. Although the Compensation Committee has the authority, it has not engaged any outside compensation consultants to assist the Committee in determining the compensation policies of the Company, and no such outside consultants have been engaged by the Company or the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee charter was amended by the Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Hurt no longer meets the criteria for director independence under NASDAQ listing standards.in May 2013. The Board will select another memberpurpose of the amendments was to change the number of directors on the Committee to two, to clarify if the Committee retains the services of an outside consultant for guidance, it is permitted to do so at the Company’s expense, and to reflect that the Chief Executive Officer and senior executives of the Company are not to be present during 2013. The Boardthe Committee’s deliberations or voting on their compensation. A copy of Directors and the Compensation Committee have adopted a written charter, a copy of whichas amended, was attached as AnnexExhibit B to the Company’s 2011 Proxy Statement.

The Board as Nominating Committee

The Company does not have a standing nominating committee. The Board of Directors acts as the nominating committee, with Mr. Drimal and Ms. Cummings abstaining. The majority of the Directors of the Company, Messrs. Eckenstein, Fong, Gimbel, Smeets and Smeets,Wehrle, who function as a nominating committee, are believed to satisfy applicable regulatory requirements for independence. Those Directors are responsible for collecting and analyzing information with regard to directors’ “independence” as defined by NASDAQ listing standards and other pertinent legal and/or regulatory standards in effect at the time. They are also responsible for making recommendations concerning committee membership and ensuring that committee members satisfy the criteria for membership on a particular committee for independence and have the skills to effectively participate on a particular committee. The Directors who function as the nominating committee are also responsible for identifying and evaluating prospective nominees for vacancies on the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors will consider meritorious director candidates submitted to it by members of the Board and by stockholders of the Company, without regard to race, religion, gender, national origin or disability. The Board does not have a formal policy with regard to considering diversity in its consideration of director nominations. Candidates for election must be willing to devote the time necessary to serve as a director and must possess the level of education, experience, and expertise, both with respect to financial matters and the oil and gas industry in general, required to perform the duties of a member of the board of directors of a public company, and in particular of the Company. The Board of Directors strive to recommend candidates that further its objective of having a board that encompasses a broad range of talents and expertise and reflects a diversity of background, experience and viewpoints. The procedure to be followed by a shareholderstockholder to submit a nominee to the Committee is set forth in “Stockholder Proposals and Nominations” in this Proxy Statement.proxy statement.

The Board of Directors believes that this procedure is adequate in the process of selecting persons for electionselection as Directors of the Company. The sevenAll of the Directors of the Company currently serving as Directors wereare designated as nominees for re-election at the 20132016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. No other nomineesThere were considered and no nominations were proposed by any stockholder or group.

EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Compensation Overview

The Company has been guided by its Chief Executive Office,Officer, Charles E. Drimal, Jr., and Chief Financial Officer, Beverly A. Cummings since 1987. The Board of Directors attributes much of the success of the Company to Mr. Drimal’s and Ms. Cummings’ leadership, skills and dedication to the Company and its shareholders.stockholders. In order to retain such highly skilled and experienced professionals for its senior management team, the Board of Directors must offer highly competitive compensation packages. At the same time, the Board of Directors is mindful that the primary goal of the Company is to build long-term shareholderstockholder value. Therefore, the alignment of the executive officers’ compensation with the Company’s performance results is a critical component of the analysis made by the Compensation Committee in determining the executive officers’ compensation each year.

The Board of Directors believe that the Compensation Committee’s approach in determining the compensation paid to the executive officers has been endorsed by the stockholders, who in 2013 overwhelmingly supported the “say on pay” resolution to approve the executive compensation disclosed in that year’s proxy statement and voted for the frequency of their advisory vote to be held once every three years thereafter. In light of that endorsement, the Compensation Committee has adhered to that same approach in the years following that stockholders’ vote, including the current year.

There are three elements of the compensation paid to the senior management team,executive officers, to wit: (i) base salary; (ii) bonus (cash incentive) compensation, and (iii) equity awards. The base salaries that were provided to the senior management teamexecutive officers were based upon a number of considerations including each executive officer’s level of responsibility, changes in their responsibilities from year to year, experience, skills and leadership ability. The Compensation Committee reviewed the base salary paid in the most recent years and the percentage change in salary from year to year. The Compensation Committee used judgment and discretion rather than relying on any specific formula for results. The Compensation Committee weighed the difficult tasks undertaken by the executive officers in guiding the Company through a period of historic and challenging industry-wide economic downturn. Additionally, the Compensation Committee gave consideration to its decision not to award any bonus compensation to the executive officer’s ability to be awarded additional compensationofficers in the form of a bonus which compensation was more directly tied to the Company’s performance.2015, as discussed below. After discussingreviewing all of those considerations, the Compensation Committee recommended that each of the executive officers be given the same percentage increase in each of the executive officer’s salary.their salaries. The base salary paid to each executive officer in 20122015 is set forth in the “Salary” column of the Summary Compensation Table set forth in this proxy statement.

The cash incentive bonus compensation awarded to each executive officer is intended to correlate to the Company’s performance. TheIn 2015, the executive officers advised the Compensation Committee focused on performance measures such asthat in light of the increase in oildramatically lower commodity price environment and gas reserves, debt level, growththe resultant reduction in the Company’s well servicing subsidiariescash flow and growth inearnings, they had determined that no employees of the

Company’s oil and gas operations. The Company would be awarded bonus compensation for the year. They urged the Compensation Committee believes this combination of metric categories isto apply the important measurement necessary for increasing shareholder valuesame performance metrics and growinganalysis in its deliberations and come to a similar conclusion regarding the Company.bonus compensation to be awarded to the executive officers. As a result, the Compensation Committee recommended that there be no incentive bonus compensation awarded each ofto the executive officers a cash incentive bonus. Thein 2015. Therefore, the cash bonus paid to each executive officer in 20122015 is set forthreflected as $0 in the “Bonus” column of the Summary Compensation Table set forth in this proxy statement.

The Company awarded options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock to the executive officers in May 1989. The objective of the award was to retain high level officers and to motivate them to continue their relationship with the Company and thereby align their interests with the long term interests of its shareholders.stockholders. The options that were awarded have been fully exercisable by the executive officers since May 1994. The Compensation Committee believes the options awarded to the executive officers represent a significant stake in the Company and determined not to award any more options or other types of equity compensation to the executive officers in 2012.2015.

At the Annual Meeting held in 2013, the stockholders voted to hold an advisory, non-binding vote to approve executive compensation once every 3 years. Proposal No. 2 set forth in this proxy statement asks stockholders to approve, in a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid to the executive officers in 2015.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table discloses compensation for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20122015 and 2011,2014, received by the Company’s Principal Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer and Principal AccountingFinancial Officer (1) (2).

(6)	Includes $2,000$6,000 Director’s fees; $9,800$10,400 as the Company’s contribution to its 401(k) plan; club dues $5,585;$12,490; automobile allowance $4,375;$4,387; long term disability insurance premium $6,745;$6,759; and life insurance premiums $1,806.$2,772.

(7)	Ms. Pizor resigned from her position in June 2011.

(8)	Includes $7,600 as the Company’s contribution to its 401(k) plan; and life insurance premium $409.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

There were no stock options granted by the Company to the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012,2015, no options were exercised by any of such persons and there were no stock awards to such persons. The following table sets forth information with respect to all unexercised options held by the named executive officers of the Company at December 31, 2012.2015. All unexercised options are fully exercisable. There are no options which are not fully exercisable. References relating toexercisable, nor are there any unearned options, which are unexercisable,stock awards or equity incentive plan awards, unearned options and stock awards are omitted in the table below.awards.

Unexercised Options

Director Compensation

The Company’s Directors each receive $500$2,000 for each Board of Directors meeting, but do not receive any fee for attending Committee meetings. The Directors are reimbursed for travel and related expenses in connection with attendance at Board and Committee meetings. All Directors as a group of seven received an aggregate of $10,500$28,000 as cash Directors’ fees for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. No reference is made for “Stock Awards”, “Option Awards”, “Non-Equity2015. The Directors do not receive any compensation in the form of Common Stock or option awards of Common Stock, nor do they participate in any Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation”Compensation or “Non-QualifiedNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” as the Company has no such Director awards or compensation.plans.

ADVISORY NON-BINDING VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(Proposal No. 2 on the Proxy)2)

The Board of Directors believes that the Company’s compensation programspolicies and policiesstructure are centered on a pay for performance culture and are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of shareholders.stockholders.

The Board of Directors is asking shareholdersstockholders to vote in an advisory, non-binding manner on the compensation paid to our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”), as disclosed in this Proxy Statementproxy statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K (including the compensation tables and accompanying narrative discussion). Item 402 of Regulation S-K is the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission regulation that sets forth what companies must include in their proxy statement as to compensation.

This proposal, commonly known as a “Say on Pay” proposal, gives you as a shareholderstockholder the opportunity to vote on the Company’s executive paycompensation program. In proposal no. 3, the Board of Directors is seeking your advice

on the frequency of such votes in the future. Pursuant to section 14A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, which is applicable to smaller reporting companies this year, the Board of Directors is requesting shareholdersstockholders to cast a non-binding, advisory vote on the following resolution:

“Resolved,RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s NamedPrincipal Executive Officers,Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, in the compensation tables and narrative discussion herein is hereby APPROVED.”

Since your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board of Directors. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR this Resolution.

(Proposal No. 2 on the Proxy)2)

ADVISORY NON-BINDING VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF SAY-ON-PAY VOTES

(Proposal No. 3 on the Proxy)

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, which is applicable to smaller reporting companies this year, our shareholders are being asked to vote, on an advisory basis, on how frequently our shareholders should have a “Say on Pay” vote in the future. Although this frequency vote is advisory and is not binding on the Board of Directors, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering how frequently to hold Say on Pay votes. You may choose from the following alternatives: every year, every two years, every three years or you may abstain. The Directors of the Company will ask you to vote on an advisory basis on the frequency of Say on Pay votes at least once every six years. Shareholders are not voting to approve or disapprove the Board of Director’s recommendation.

The Board of Directors believes and recommends that the Say on Pay vote should be conducted every three years so that shareholders may express their views on the Company’s executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee, which administers the Company’s executive compensation program, values the opinions expressed by shareholders in these votes and will continue to consider the outcome of these votes in making its decisions on executive compensation.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote to conduct future Say on Pay votes everythree years.

(Proposal No. 3 on the Proxy)

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report with management including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The Audit Committee reviewed with the independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under generally accepted auditing standards. These include, but are not limited to, those matters under Statements on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended and adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the auditors’ independence from management and the Company

including the matters in the written disclosures required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The Company’s auditors do not perform financial information system design and implementation services, internal audit or tax services for the Company.services.

The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their audits. The Audit Committee meets with the independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board has approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012,2015, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Committee has also recommended the selection of the Company’s independent auditors for 2013.

Audit Committee

Jan K. Smeets, Chairman

Matthias EckensteinThomas S. T. Gimbel

Clint HurtEbersole Gaines Wehrle

This report of the Audit Committee shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statementproxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS

The Company is committed to observing sound, ethical principles in the conduct of its business and operations and by our officers and employees in the course of their duties. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics adopted by the Company was amended in December, 2011. The Code, as amended, is available at the Company’s web-sitewebsite atwww.primeenergy.com. The Code of Conduct is applicable to the Company’s operations and to all of its employees, including the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer principal accounting officer, and Directors. Any amendments to or waivers of the Code, to the extent applicable to the Company’s principal executive officers, will be posted on the Company’s web-site.website.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended requires the Company’s executive officers and Directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities (collectively, “Reporting Persons”), to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of such securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to furnish the Company with copies of such reports. To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012,2015, no Reporting Persons failed to file reports on a timely basis during the most recent fiscal year.

INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS —- FEES AND SERVICES

The Company engaged Grassi & Co. (of which Pustorino, Puglisi, CPA, P.C. (“Grassi & Co. LLC is a division)”) as the principal accountants for the Company with respect to the audit of the Company’s financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20122015 and 2011.2014. There were no disagreements with Grassi & Co on any matters of accounting

principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures in connection with their audits. Representatives of Grassi & Co are not expected to be present at the 20132016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, but will be available by speaker telephone during the meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and will be available to answer stockholders’ questions.

The audit fees for professional audit services provided by Grassi & Co, for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for each of the years ended December 31, 2012,2015 and December 31, 2011,2014, were $309,500$279,000 and $295,500.$269,300, respectively. No fees were billed or paid by the Company for internal audit, tax or other services for the years ended December 31, 20122015 or 2011.2014.

STOCKHOLDERS’ PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS

Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, stockholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy and for consideration at its annual meeting of stockholders by submitting their proposals to the Company in a timely manner. In order to be so included for the 20142017 Annual Meeting, stockholder proposals must be received by the Company at its principal executive offices at 9821 Katy Freeway, Houston, Texas 77024, no later than December 6, 2013,23, 2016, and must otherwise comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8.

Stockholder proposals to be brought before the 20142017 Annual Meeting, made outside the Rule 14a-8 processes, must be submitted to the Company pursuant to Rule 14a-8, no later than February 19, 2014,March 13, 2017, or will be considered untimely and entitle the Company to discretionary voting under Rule 14a-4.

If a stockholder desires to recommend an individual as a nominee for director to the Board of Directors, the stockholder shall mail the recommendation to the Secretary of the Board of Directors. The recommendation must include the name, address (business and personal) and the occupation of the nominee. The recommendation must also include such other information regarding the nominee as may reasonably be required by the Company.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

ShareholdersStockholders may communicate with the members of the Board of Directors by mailing their communications to the Company, at PrimeEnergy Corporation, 9821 Katy Freeway, Houston, Texas 77024. All communications addressed to the attention of a particular director shall be forwarded to the director.

ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Annual Report of the Company for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2012,2015, accompanies this Proxy Statement.proxy statement. The audited financial statements of the Company are included in such Annual Report.

It is important that proxies be returned promptly. Stockholders are requested to date, sign and return the enclosed proxy in the enclosed envelope, to which no postage need be affixed if mailed in the United States. If you attend the 20132016 Annual Meeting, you may revoke your proxy and vote in person if you so desire, otherwise your proxy will be voted for you.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

/s/    PATRICIA C. DELANEY

PATRICIA C. DELANEY

Secretary

Houston, Texas

April 5, 201322, 2016

PrimeEnergy Corporation

IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

Annual Meeting Proxy Card

The Board recommends a vote FOR all Nominees.

The Board recommends a vote FOR item 2 and FOR a three year frequency on item 3.approval.

In their discretion, the proxies appointed herein are authorized to vote upon any other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof.

Non-Voting Items

Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below

Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title.

q  PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.q

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Proxy — PrimeEnergy Corporation

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned shareholder of PrimeEnergy Corporation (the “Company”), revoking all prior proxies, does by these presents name, constitute and appoint Charles E. Drimal, Jr. and Patricia C. Delaney, and each of them, the true and lawful proxy and attorney-in-fact of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote all shares of the Common Stock, par value $.10 per share, of the Company standing in the name ofnameof the undersigned on the books of the Company at the close of business on March 26, 2013,April 5, 2016, or in respect of which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Thursday,Tuesday, May 2, 2013,10, 2016, at 9:00 a.m., EST,EDT, at the offices of the Company, One Landmark Square, 11th Floor, Stamford, CT 06901, and at any and all adjournments of said meeting, hereby granting to said proxies and attorneys-in-fact, and each of them, full power and authority to vote in the name of the undersigned at said meeting, and at any and all adjournments thereof, on the matters set forth on reverse side.

PLEASE SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE AND RETURN PROMPTLY.

(Continued and to be signed and dated on reverse side.)